Department of Linguistics
A NATIONAL BULLETIN ON ISSUES IN
AUSTRALIAN STYLE AND ENGLISH IN AUSTRALIA
| Volume 16 No 2 | December 2009 |
lettersDear Pam I have a curly question for you. For as long as I can remember, ships have been referred to as female; My question is this: is it politically correct to refer to ships as Phil Helmore via email Responses 1. Dear Adam Lindy Shultz The Australian National University 2. What nostalgia to see that old chestnut about whether or not it's PC to call ships she (Phil Helmore April 2009)! Long and strong did that one rage here at the Australian National Maritime Museum in our earlier days. Some believed the feminisation of vessels to be a poetic tribute to the beauty of ships and the bond sailors feel to them. Others believed it signified that women AND ships were possessions to be owned and controlled by men. The issues were explored in depth in my paper 'Heirlooms and Teatowels: Views of Ships Gender in the Modern Maritime Museum' (Mellefont J R 2000, The Great Circle, Journal of the Australian Association for Maritime History Vol 22 No 1 pp. 5--16. it was never really resolved; the antagonists just wore each other out and in the end carried on with their preferred usage in their own spheres of influence. Ships are never referred to by the feminine personal pronouns in this museum's exhibitions; in its publications they are 'she', 'her', 'it/s' as appropriate. |


